Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uruguay–Vietnam relations (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Weak keep is keep. Tone 16:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uruguay–Vietnam relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted. Fails WP:GNG. Could not find significant coverage. 3 of the 6 sources merely confirm embassies (or non resident embassy). The fact that Uruguay sells beef to Vietnam is hardly noteworthy given Uruguay sells beef worldwide. LibStar (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:JUSTAVOTE. LibStar (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lean Keep (in between Weak Keep and Keep) - there were some other visits, like the MFA of Uruguay to Hanoi in 2010, the visit of the deputy PM of Vietnam to Montevideo [16], a 2014 scientific agreement [17], a trade and investment agreement in 2016 [18], so I think an encyclopedic version of it all could have its place in the encyclopedia. I think that should be enough for a start-class article. There was also a study that I read while browsing that covered Latin America-Vietnam relations and had two paragraphs about the Vietnam-Uruguay relation, but I can't seem to find it at the moment. Not seeing presidential visits, though, and that's why I'm only lean keep. On the economic front, we're well over the keep mark, though. Pilaz (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.